P.V. BIJARAWA(R.N-2) PS 407
SATYENDRA RAI
BJPBJP241 votes at this polling station
over RAMESH CHAND YADAV (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 241 | 40.50% | |
| 2 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 189 | 31.76% | |
| 3 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 146 | 24.54% | |
| 4 | NOTA | NOTA | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 5 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 6 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 7 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 8 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 9 | SUBASH | NP | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 10 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 11 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 12 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 595 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 241 | 40.50% | 1 | 76 | Strong |
| BSP | 189 | 31.76% | 2 | 75 | Average |
| SP | 146 | 24.54% | 3 | 274 | Weak |
| VIP | 3 | 0.50% | 8 | 150 | Poor |
| RJM | 3 | 0.50% | 7 | 87 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.50% | 5 | 241 | Poor |
| NOTA | 3 | 0.50% | 6 | 233 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 3 | 0.50% | 4 | 223 | Poor |
| NP | 2 | 0.34% | 9 | 208 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 1 | 0.17% | 11 | 249 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.17% | 10 | 210 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 415 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.