P.V. PHULWARI (R.N-1) PS 400
RAMESH CHAND YADAV
BSPBSP154 votes at this polling station
over SATYENDRA RAI (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 154 | 40.42% | |
| 2 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 150 | 39.37% | |
| 3 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 57 | 14.96% | |
| 4 | SUBASH | NP | 5 | 1.31% | |
| 5 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 4 | 1.05% | |
| 6 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 3 | 0.79% | |
| 7 | NOTA | NOTA | 3 | 0.79% | |
| 8 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 2 | 0.52% | |
| 9 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 10 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 11 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 12 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 381 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 154 | 40.42% | 1 | 113 | Strong |
| BJP | 150 | 39.37% | 2 | 188 | Average |
| SP | 57 | 14.96% | 3 | 390 | Weak |
| NP | 5 | 1.31% | 4 | 43 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 4 | 1.05% | 5 | 188 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.79% | 6 | 240 | Poor |
| NOTA | 3 | 0.79% | 7 | 230 | Poor |
| BMP | 2 | 0.52% | 8 | 80 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.26% | 9 | 266 | Poor |
| RJM | 1 | 0.26% | 10 | 269 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.26% | 11 | 296 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 414 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.