P.V. BHAVA RAIPUR PATTI TANDAN RAI NAYA BHAVAN (R.N.-2) PS 399
NAFEES AHMAD
SPSP267 votes at this polling station
over ABDULA (AIMIM)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 267 | 69.35% | |
| 2 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 74 | 19.22% | |
| 3 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 31 | 8.05% | |
| 4 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 10 | 2.60% | |
| 5 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 3 | 0.78% | |
| 6 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 7 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | SUBASH | NP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | NOTA | NOTA | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 385 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 267 | 69.35% | 1 | 97 | Strong |
| AIMIM | 74 | 19.22% | 2 | 47 | Weak |
| BSP | 31 | 8.05% | 3 | 323 | Poor |
| BJP | 10 | 2.60% | 4 | 404 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.78% | 5 | 239 | Poor |
| NOTA | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 417 | Poor |
| NP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 419 | Poor |
| RJM | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 417 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 412 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 413 | Poor |
| VIP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 415 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 6 | 411 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.