P.V. KHALISPUR (R.N-1) PS 395

AC 344 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

NAFEES AHMAD

SPSP

261 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

148 28.1 pp

votes

over SATYENDRA RAI (BJP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors1,084

Total turnout526votes cast at this station

Turnout %48.5% of this booth's roll

Male electors262

Female electors264

Vote share in this booth

of 526 votes counted

SP 49.6% BJP 21.5% BSP 18.6% AIMIM 8.9% INC 0.4% NP 0.4% NOTA 0.4% IDPDNT 0.2%

Candidates at this booth

12 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	NAFEES AHMAD	SP	261	49.62%
2	SATYENDRA RAI	BJP	113	21.48%
3	RAMESH CHAND YADAV	BSP	98	18.63%
4	ABDULA	AIMIM	47	8.94%
5	MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG	INC	2	0.38%
6	SUBASH	NP	2	0.38%
7	NOTA	NOTA	2	0.38%
8	MITRASEN	IDPDNT	1	0.19%
9	MANOJ KUMAR	BMP	0	0.00%
10	MUNNA LAL	RJM	0	0.00%
11	YOGENDRA YADAV	VIP	0	0.00%
12	ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV	AAP	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 526 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

12 parties · AC 344

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
SP	261	49.62%	1	107	Strong
BJP	113	21.48%	2	229	Weak
BSP	98	18.63%	3	202	Weak
AIMIM	47	8.94%	4	63	Poor
INC	2	0.38%	5	315	Poor
NOTA	2	0.38%	6	301	Poor
NP	2	0.38%	7	206	Poor
IDPDNT	1	0.19%	8	246	Poor
VIP	0	0.00%	12	414	Poor
RJM	0	0.00%	11	416	Poor
AAP	0	0.00%	9	408	Poor
BMP	0	0.00%	10	410	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.