P.V.AKBARPUR BRAMSTHAN(R.N.2) PS 376
NAFEES AHMAD
SPSP242 votes at this polling station
over RAMESH CHAND YADAV (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 242 | 75.39% | |
| 2 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 44 | 13.71% | |
| 3 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 26 | 8.10% | |
| 4 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 3 | 0.93% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 2 | 0.62% | |
| 6 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 7 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 8 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 9 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 10 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SUBASH | NP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 321 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 242 | 75.39% | 1 | 130 | Strong |
| BSP | 44 | 13.71% | 2 | 292 | Weak |
| BJP | 26 | 8.10% | 3 | 375 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.93% | 4 | 235 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.62% | 5 | 300 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.31% | 7 | 198 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 1 | 0.31% | 6 | 358 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 1 | 0.31% | 8 | 242 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.31% | 9 | 285 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 400 | Poor |
| NP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 413 | Poor |
| RJM | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 408 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.