P.V. NAUBRAR DEVARA JADID KITA -I AUGHARGANG (R.N.-3) PS 35
NAFEES AHMAD
SPSP352 votes at this polling station
over SATYENDRA RAI (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 352 | 69.29% | |
| 2 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 78 | 15.35% | |
| 3 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 50 | 9.84% | |
| 4 | NOTA | NOTA | 11 | 2.17% | |
| 5 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 7 | 1.38% | |
| 6 | SUBASH | NP | 4 | 0.79% | |
| 7 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 3 | 0.59% | |
| 8 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 2 | 0.39% | |
| 9 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 10 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 508 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 352 | 69.29% | 1 | 41 | Strong |
| BJP | 78 | 15.35% | 2 | 279 | Weak |
| BSP | 50 | 9.84% | 3 | 282 | Poor |
| NOTA | 11 | 2.17% | 4 | 9 | Poor |
| VIP | 7 | 1.38% | 5 | 61 | Poor |
| NP | 4 | 0.79% | 6 | 46 | Poor |
| BMP | 3 | 0.59% | 7 | 20 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.39% | 8 | 117 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 1 | 0.20% | 9 | 139 | Poor |
| INC | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 386 | Poor |
| RJM | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 286 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 369 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.