P.V. NAUBRAR DEVARA JADID KITA -I AUGHARGANG (R.N.-1) PS 33
SATYENDRA RAI
BJPBJP263 votes at this polling station
over NAFEES AHMAD (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 263 | 40.71% | |
| 2 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 231 | 35.76% | |
| 3 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 110 | 17.03% | |
| 4 | NOTA | NOTA | 11 | 1.70% | |
| 5 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 6 | 0.93% | |
| 6 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 6 | 0.93% | |
| 7 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 5 | 0.77% | |
| 8 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 5 | 0.77% | |
| 9 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 3 | 0.46% | |
| 10 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 3 | 0.46% | |
| 11 | SUBASH | NP | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 12 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 1 | 0.15% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 646 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 263 | 40.71% | 1 | 49 | Strong |
| SP | 231 | 35.76% | 2 | 143 | Average |
| BSP | 110 | 17.03% | 3 | 178 | Weak |
| NOTA | 11 | 1.70% | 4 | 8 | Poor |
| AAP | 6 | 0.93% | 5 | 31 | Poor |
| VIP | 6 | 0.93% | 6 | 70 | Poor |
| RJM | 5 | 0.77% | 8 | 19 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 5 | 0.77% | 7 | 141 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 3 | 0.46% | 9 | 31 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.46% | 10 | 169 | Poor |
| NP | 2 | 0.31% | 11 | 142 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.15% | 12 | 92 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.