P.V. JAIRAJPUR (ATIRIKT BHAVAN) R.N.4 PS 327
RAMESH CHAND YADAV
BSPBSP176 votes at this polling station
over NAFEES AHMAD (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 176 | 43.67% | |
| 2 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 139 | 34.49% | |
| 3 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 43 | 10.67% | |
| 4 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 30 | 7.44% | |
| 5 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 4 | 0.99% | |
| 6 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 3 | 0.74% | |
| 7 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 2 | 0.50% | |
| 8 | SUBASH | NP | 2 | 0.50% | |
| 9 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 10 | NOTA | NOTA | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 11 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 12 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 1 | 0.25% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 403 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 176 | 43.67% | 1 | 83 | Strong |
| SP | 139 | 34.49% | 2 | 281 | Average |
| BJP | 43 | 10.67% | 3 | 343 | Weak |
| AIMIM | 30 | 7.44% | 4 | 72 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.99% | 5 | 155 | Poor |
| RJM | 3 | 0.74% | 6 | 75 | Poor |
| NP | 2 | 0.50% | 8 | 196 | Poor |
| BMP | 2 | 0.50% | 7 | 69 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.25% | 9 | 251 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.25% | 11 | 367 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 1 | 0.25% | 10 | 231 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.25% | 12 | 266 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.