P.V. JAGMALPUR (R.N.-2) PS 323
RAMESH CHAND YADAV
BSPBSP171 votes at this polling station
over NAFEES AHMAD (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 171 | 42.86% | |
| 2 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 106 | 26.57% | |
| 3 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 97 | 24.31% | |
| 4 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 11 | 2.76% | |
| 5 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 4 | 1.00% | |
| 6 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 3 | 0.75% | |
| 7 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 2 | 0.50% | |
| 8 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 2 | 0.50% | |
| 9 | NOTA | NOTA | 2 | 0.50% | |
| 10 | SUBASH | NP | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 11 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 399 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 171 | 42.86% | 1 | 94 | Strong |
| SP | 106 | 26.57% | 2 | 326 | Average |
| AIMIM | 97 | 24.31% | 3 | 26 | Weak |
| BJP | 11 | 2.76% | 4 | 399 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 1.00% | 5 | 154 | Poor |
| RJM | 3 | 0.75% | 6 | 74 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.50% | 8 | 287 | Poor |
| BMP | 2 | 0.50% | 7 | 67 | Poor |
| VIP | 2 | 0.50% | 9 | 201 | Poor |
| NP | 1 | 0.25% | 10 | 289 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 371 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 372 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.