P.V. JAGMALPUR (R.N.-1) PS 322
RAMESH CHAND YADAV
BSPBSP150 votes at this polling station
over ABDULA (AIMIM)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 150 | 39.47% | |
| 2 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 114 | 30.00% | |
| 3 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 84 | 22.11% | |
| 4 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 22 | 5.79% | |
| 5 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 4 | 1.05% | |
| 6 | NOTA | NOTA | 2 | 0.53% | |
| 7 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 8 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 9 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 10 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 11 | SUBASH | NP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 380 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 150 | 39.47% | 1 | 118 | Average |
| AIMIM | 114 | 30.00% | 2 | 18 | Average |
| SP | 84 | 22.11% | 3 | 352 | Weak |
| BJP | 22 | 5.79% | 4 | 383 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 1.05% | 5 | 153 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.53% | 6 | 286 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.26% | 7 | 249 | Poor |
| RJM | 1 | 0.26% | 9 | 247 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.26% | 8 | 182 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.26% | 10 | 264 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 371 | Poor |
| NP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 391 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.