P.V. NAUBRAR TRIPURARPUR KHALSA (R.N.-3) PS 32
RAMESH CHAND YADAV
BSPBSP282 votes at this polling station
over NAFEES AHMAD (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 282 | 46.92% | |
| 2 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 262 | 43.59% | |
| 3 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 33 | 5.49% | |
| 4 | NOTA | NOTA | 11 | 1.83% | |
| 5 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 4 | 0.67% | |
| 6 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 7 | SUBASH | NP | 3 | 0.50% | |
| 8 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 9 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 10 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 601 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 282 | 46.92% | 1 | 18 | Strong |
| SP | 262 | 43.59% | 2 | 105 | Strong |
| BJP | 33 | 5.49% | 3 | 363 | Poor |
| NOTA | 11 | 1.83% | 4 | 7 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.67% | 5 | 115 | Poor |
| NP | 3 | 0.50% | 7 | 80 | Poor |
| BMP | 3 | 0.50% | 6 | 19 | Poor |
| VIP | 2 | 0.33% | 8 | 158 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 1 | 0.17% | 9 | 297 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 286 | Poor |
| RJM | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 285 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 266 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.