P.V. GULVAGAURI (R.N.-2) PS 319
NAFEES AHMAD
SPSP161 votes at this polling station
over RAMESH CHAND YADAV (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 161 | 39.85% | |
| 2 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 145 | 35.89% | |
| 3 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 75 | 18.56% | |
| 4 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 9 | 2.23% | |
| 5 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 9 | 2.23% | |
| 6 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 2 | 0.50% | |
| 7 | NOTA | NOTA | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 8 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 9 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 1 | 0.25% | |
| 10 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SUBASH | NP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 404 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 161 | 39.85% | 1 | 261 | Average |
| BSP | 145 | 35.89% | 2 | 123 | Average |
| AIMIM | 75 | 18.56% | 3 | 45 | Weak |
| BJP | 9 | 2.23% | 4 | 407 | Poor |
| INC | 9 | 2.23% | 5 | 27 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 2 | 0.50% | 6 | 121 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.25% | 7 | 181 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.25% | 8 | 366 | Poor |
| RJM | 1 | 0.25% | 9 | 245 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 369 | Poor |
| NP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 390 | Poor |
| VIP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 388 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.