P. V. HARIPUR (R.N.-2) PS 317

AC 344 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

NAFEES AHMAD

SPSP

138 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

27 7.9 pp

votes

over SATYENDRA RAI (BJP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors601

Total turnout342votes cast at this station

Turnout %56.9% of this booth's roll

Male electors180

Female electors162

Vote share in this booth

of 342 votes counted

SP 40.4% BJP 32.5% BSP 18.1% AIMIM 6.7% INC 0.6% RJM 0.6% NOTA 0.6% IDPDNT 0.3% AAP 0.3%

Candidates at this booth

12 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	NAFEES AHMAD	SP	138	40.35%
2	SATYENDRA RAI	BJP	111	32.46%
3	RAMESH CHAND YADAV	BSP	62	18.13%
4	ABDULA	AIMIM	23	6.73%
5	MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG	INC	2	0.58%
6	MUNNA LAL	RJM	2	0.58%
7	NOTA	NOTA	2	0.58%
8	MITRASEN	IDPDNT	1	0.29%
9	ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV	AAP	1	0.29%
10	SUBASH	NP	0	0.00%
11	YOGENDRA YADAV	VIP	0	0.00%
12	MANOJ KUMAR	BMP	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 342 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

12 parties · AC 344

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
SP	138	40.35%	1	283	Strong
BJP	111	32.46%	2	232	Average
BSP	62	18.13%	3	256	Weak
AIMIM	23	6.73%	4	76	Poor
INC	2	0.58%	5	304	Poor
NOTA	2	0.58%	6	285	Poor
RJM	2	0.58%	7	143	Poor
IDPDNT	1	0.29%	9	227	Poor
AAP	1	0.29%	8	248	Poor
BMP	0	0.00%	10	373	Poor
NP	0	0.00%	11	388	Poor
VIP	0	0.00%	12	387	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.