P.V. NAUBRAR TRIPURARPUR KHALSA (R.N.-2) PS 31
NAFEES AHMAD
SPSP322 votes at this polling station
over RAMESH CHAND YADAV (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 322 | 77.22% | |
| 2 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 60 | 14.39% | |
| 3 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 15 | 3.60% | |
| 4 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 4 | 0.96% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 4 | 0.96% | |
| 6 | SUBASH | NP | 3 | 0.72% | |
| 7 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 2 | 0.48% | |
| 8 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 2 | 0.48% | |
| 9 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 2 | 0.48% | |
| 10 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 11 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 12 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 1 | 0.24% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 417 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 322 | 77.22% | 1 | 56 | Strong |
| BSP | 60 | 14.39% | 2 | 260 | Weak |
| BJP | 15 | 3.60% | 3 | 391 | Poor |
| INC | 4 | 0.96% | 4 | 114 | Poor |
| NOTA | 4 | 0.96% | 5 | 124 | Poor |
| NP | 3 | 0.72% | 6 | 79 | Poor |
| RJM | 2 | 0.48% | 9 | 92 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.48% | 7 | 115 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 2 | 0.48% | 8 | 226 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.24% | 10 | 91 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 1 | 0.24% | 11 | 138 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.24% | 12 | 214 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.