P.V. ISMAILPUR GORIYA(R.N.1) PS 309
SATYENDRA RAI
BJPBJP321 votes at this polling station
over NAFEES AHMAD (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 321 | 50.16% | |
| 2 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 204 | 31.88% | |
| 3 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 97 | 15.16% | |
| 4 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 4 | 0.62% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 4 | 0.62% | |
| 6 | SUBASH | NP | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 7 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 8 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 9 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 10 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 640 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 321 | 50.16% | 1 | 18 | Strong |
| SP | 204 | 31.88% | 2 | 184 | Average |
| BSP | 97 | 15.16% | 3 | 205 | Weak |
| INC | 4 | 0.63% | 4 | 148 | Poor |
| NOTA | 4 | 0.63% | 5 | 161 | Poor |
| NP | 3 | 0.47% | 6 | 116 | Poor |
| RJM | 3 | 0.47% | 7 | 72 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.31% | 8 | 166 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 352 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.16% | 10 | 179 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 368 | Poor |
| VIP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 383 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.