P.V. NAUBRAR TRIPURARPUR KHALSA (R.N.-1) PS 30
NAFEES AHMAD
SPSP325 votes at this polling station
over SATYENDRA RAI (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 325 | 74.20% | |
| 2 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 64 | 14.61% | |
| 3 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 35 | 7.99% | |
| 4 | NOTA | NOTA | 5 | 1.14% | |
| 5 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 6 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 2 | 0.46% | |
| 7 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 8 | SUBASH | NP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 9 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 10 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 11 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 1 | 0.23% | |
| 12 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 438 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 325 | 74.20% | 1 | 55 | Strong |
| BJP | 64 | 14.61% | 2 | 304 | Weak |
| BSP | 35 | 7.99% | 3 | 314 | Poor |
| NOTA | 5 | 1.14% | 4 | 95 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 2 | 0.46% | 5 | 71 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.46% | 6 | 246 | Poor |
| NP | 1 | 0.23% | 10 | 217 | Poor |
| RJM | 1 | 0.23% | 11 | 168 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.23% | 9 | 90 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.23% | 7 | 186 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 1 | 0.23% | 8 | 296 | Poor |
| VIP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 306 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.