P. V. LEDUPAR (R.N.1) PS 291
NAFEES AHMAD
SPSP130 votes at this polling station
over RAMESH CHAND YADAV (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 130 | 39.16% | |
| 2 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 118 | 35.54% | |
| 3 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 76 | 22.89% | |
| 4 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 3 | 0.90% | |
| 5 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 2 | 0.60% | |
| 6 | NOTA | NOTA | 2 | 0.60% | |
| 7 | SUBASH | NP | 1 | 0.30% | |
| 8 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 332 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 130 | 39.16% | 1 | 295 | Average |
| BSP | 118 | 35.54% | 2 | 158 | Average |
| BJP | 76 | 22.89% | 3 | 283 | Weak |
| AIMIM | 3 | 0.90% | 4 | 218 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.60% | 5 | 296 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.60% | 6 | 277 | Poor |
| NP | 1 | 0.30% | 7 | 282 | Poor |
| RJM | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 375 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 360 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 358 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 360 | Poor |
| VIP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 375 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.