MADAN MOHAN MALVIYA I.C. KANDHARAPUR(R.N.-3) PS 269
NAFEES AHMAD
SPSP497 votes at this polling station
over SATYENDRA RAI (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 497 | 59.88% | |
| 2 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 257 | 30.96% | |
| 3 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 39 | 4.70% | |
| 4 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 8 | 0.96% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 8 | 0.96% | |
| 6 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 7 | 0.84% | |
| 7 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 4 | 0.48% | |
| 8 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 3 | 0.36% | |
| 9 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 3 | 0.36% | |
| 10 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 3 | 0.36% | |
| 11 | SUBASH | NP | 1 | 0.12% | |
| 12 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 830 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 497 | 59.88% | 1 | 4 | Strong |
| BJP | 257 | 30.96% | 2 | 58 | Average |
| BSP | 39 | 4.70% | 3 | 305 | Poor |
| NOTA | 8 | 0.96% | 5 | 29 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 8 | 0.96% | 4 | 119 | Poor |
| INC | 7 | 0.84% | 6 | 46 | Poor |
| VIP | 4 | 0.48% | 7 | 103 | Poor |
| RJM | 3 | 0.36% | 10 | 69 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.36% | 8 | 100 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 3 | 0.36% | 9 | 58 | Poor |
| NP | 1 | 0.12% | 11 | 274 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 346 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.