MADAN MOHAN MALVIYA I.C. KANDHARAPUR(R.N.-1) PS 267
RAMESH CHAND YADAV
BSPBSP226 votes at this polling station
over NAFEES AHMAD (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 226 | 45.20% | |
| 2 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 152 | 30.40% | |
| 3 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 83 | 16.60% | |
| 4 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 17 | 3.40% | |
| 5 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 8 | 1.60% | |
| 6 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 5 | 1.00% | |
| 7 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 3 | 0.60% | |
| 8 | SUBASH | NP | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 9 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 10 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 11 | NOTA | NOTA | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 12 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 500 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 226 | 45.20% | 1 | 43 | Strong |
| SP | 152 | 30.40% | 2 | 267 | Average |
| BJP | 83 | 16.60% | 3 | 273 | Weak |
| AIMIM | 17 | 3.40% | 4 | 89 | Poor |
| BMP | 8 | 1.60% | 5 | 5 | Poor |
| RJM | 5 | 1.00% | 6 | 28 | Poor |
| INC | 3 | 0.60% | 7 | 215 | Poor |
| NP | 2 | 0.40% | 8 | 185 | Poor |
| VIP | 2 | 0.40% | 9 | 193 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.20% | 11 | 355 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 1 | 0.20% | 10 | 216 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 347 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.