P. V. JAMIN FARENDA(R.N.-1) PS 264
SATYENDRA RAI
BJPBJP195 votes at this polling station
over NAFEES AHMAD (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 195 | 47.45% | |
| 2 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 125 | 30.41% | |
| 3 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 79 | 19.22% | |
| 4 | NOTA | NOTA | 4 | 0.97% | |
| 5 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 2 | 0.49% | |
| 6 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 2 | 0.49% | |
| 7 | SUBASH | NP | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 8 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 9 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 10 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 1 | 0.24% | |
| 11 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 411 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 195 | 47.45% | 1 | 127 | Strong |
| SP | 125 | 30.41% | 2 | 300 | Average |
| BSP | 79 | 19.22% | 3 | 227 | Weak |
| NOTA | 4 | 0.97% | 4 | 155 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.49% | 5 | 159 | Poor |
| VIP | 2 | 0.49% | 6 | 192 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.24% | 9 | 360 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 1 | 0.24% | 7 | 342 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.24% | 8 | 167 | Poor |
| NP | 1 | 0.24% | 10 | 272 | Poor |
| RJM | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 364 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 350 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.