P.V. JOLAHAPUR(R.N.1) PS 241

AC 344 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

SATYENDRA RAI

BJPBJP

365 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

229 43.5 pp

votes

over NAFEES AHMAD (SP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors927

Total turnout526votes cast at this station

Turnout %56.7% of this booth's roll

Male electors250

Female electors276

Vote share in this booth

of 526 votes counted

BJP 69.4% SP 25.9% VIP 2.7% AIMIM 0.6% BMP 0.4% INC 0.4% RJM 0.4% IDPDNT 0.2% NOTA 0.2%

Candidates at this booth

12 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	SATYENDRA RAI	BJP	365	69.39%
2	NAFEES AHMAD	SP	136	25.86%
3	YOGENDRA YADAV	VIP	14	2.66%
4	ABDULA	AIMIM	3	0.57%
5	MANOJ KUMAR	BMP	2	0.38%
6	MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG	INC	2	0.38%
7	MUNNA LAL	RJM	2	0.38%
8	MITRASEN	IDPDNT	1	0.19%
9	NOTA	NOTA	1	0.19%
10	ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV	AAP	0	0.00%
11	SUBASH	NP	0	0.00%
12	RAMESH CHAND YADAV	BSP	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 526 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

12 parties · AC 344

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
BJP	365	69.39%	1	6	Strong
SP	136	25.86%	2	285	Average
VIP	14	2.66%	3	36	Poor
AIMIM	3	0.57%	4	214	Poor
BMP	2	0.38%	5	56	Poor
INC	2	0.38%	6	285	Poor
RJM	2	0.38%	7	132	Poor
IDPDNT	1	0.19%	8	211	Poor
NOTA	1	0.19%	9	350	Poor
NP	0	0.00%	12	371	Poor
BSP	0	0.00%	11	422	Poor
AAP	0	0.00%	10	334	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.