I.C. KAPTANGANJ (R.N.-1) PS 209
SATYENDRA RAI
BJPBJP273 votes at this polling station
over RAMESH CHAND YADAV (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 273 | 50.65% | |
| 2 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 116 | 21.52% | |
| 3 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 115 | 21.34% | |
| 4 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 17 | 3.15% | |
| 5 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 6 | 1.11% | |
| 6 | NOTA | NOTA | 4 | 0.74% | |
| 7 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 3 | 0.56% | |
| 8 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 3 | 0.56% | |
| 9 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 10 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 11 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SUBASH | NP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 539 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 273 | 50.65% | 1 | 44 | Strong |
| BSP | 116 | 21.52% | 2 | 166 | Weak |
| SP | 115 | 21.34% | 3 | 310 | Weak |
| VIP | 17 | 3.15% | 4 | 32 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 6 | 1.11% | 5 | 134 | Poor |
| NOTA | 4 | 0.74% | 6 | 148 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 3 | 0.56% | 7 | 52 | Poor |
| RJM | 3 | 0.56% | 8 | 64 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.19% | 10 | 350 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.19% | 9 | 227 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 318 | Poor |
| NP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 360 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.