P.V. RUPAYANPUR (R.N.-1) PS 173
SATYENDRA RAI
BJPBJP172 votes at this polling station
over RAMESH CHAND YADAV (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 172 | 45.62% | |
| 2 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 116 | 30.77% | |
| 3 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 37 | 9.81% | |
| 4 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 32 | 8.49% | |
| 5 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 5 | 1.33% | |
| 6 | SUBASH | NP | 4 | 1.06% | |
| 7 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 2 | 0.53% | |
| 8 | NOTA | NOTA | 2 | 0.53% | |
| 9 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 2 | 0.53% | |
| 10 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 2 | 0.53% | |
| 11 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 2 | 0.53% | |
| 12 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 1 | 0.27% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 377 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 172 | 45.62% | 1 | 160 | Strong |
| BSP | 116 | 30.77% | 2 | 165 | Average |
| SP | 37 | 9.81% | 3 | 402 | Poor |
| VIP | 32 | 8.49% | 4 | 17 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 5 | 1.33% | 5 | 154 | Poor |
| NP | 4 | 1.06% | 6 | 61 | Poor |
| RJM | 2 | 0.53% | 11 | 119 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.53% | 7 | 142 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 2 | 0.53% | 8 | 94 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.53% | 9 | 275 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.53% | 10 | 258 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.27% | 12 | 138 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.