P.V. PATILA GAUSHPUR(R.N.-3) PS 140
RAMESH CHAND YADAV
BSPBSP287 votes at this polling station
over NAFEES AHMAD (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 287 | 54.88% | |
| 2 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 164 | 31.36% | |
| 3 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 41 | 7.84% | |
| 4 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 17 | 3.25% | |
| 5 | SUBASH | NP | 5 | 0.96% | |
| 6 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 3 | 0.57% | |
| 7 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 2 | 0.38% | |
| 8 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 9 | NOTA | NOTA | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 10 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 11 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 12 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 523 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BSP | 287 | 54.88% | 1 | 16 | Strong |
| SP | 164 | 31.36% | 2 | 255 | Average |
| BJP | 41 | 7.84% | 3 | 345 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 17 | 3.25% | 4 | 86 | Poor |
| NP | 5 | 0.96% | 5 | 31 | Poor |
| RJM | 3 | 0.57% | 6 | 58 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.38% | 7 | 266 | Poor |
| NOTA | 1 | 0.19% | 10 | 326 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 1 | 0.19% | 9 | 180 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.19% | 8 | 213 | Poor |
| VIP | 1 | 0.19% | 11 | 233 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 282 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.