P.V. SAIDAULI GHARTHULI BUDANPUR(R.N.-1) PS 122
SATYENDRA RAI
BJPBJP330 votes at this polling station
over NAFEES AHMAD (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 330 | 67.21% | |
| 2 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 96 | 19.55% | |
| 3 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 24 | 4.89% | |
| 4 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 8 | 1.63% | |
| 5 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 8 | 1.63% | |
| 6 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 6 | 1.22% | |
| 7 | NOTA | NOTA | 6 | 1.22% | |
| 8 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 5 | 1.02% | |
| 9 | SUBASH | NP | 3 | 0.61% | |
| 10 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 3 | 0.61% | |
| 11 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 12 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 1 | 0.20% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 491 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 330 | 67.21% | 1 | 14 | Strong |
| SP | 96 | 19.55% | 2 | 338 | Weak |
| BSP | 24 | 4.89% | 3 | 338 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 8 | 1.63% | 4 | 116 | Poor |
| VIP | 8 | 1.63% | 5 | 55 | Poor |
| AAP | 6 | 1.22% | 6 | 32 | Poor |
| NOTA | 6 | 1.22% | 7 | 72 | Poor |
| INC | 5 | 1.02% | 8 | 82 | Poor |
| NP | 3 | 0.61% | 10 | 93 | Poor |
| BMP | 3 | 0.61% | 9 | 23 | Poor |
| RJM | 1 | 0.20% | 12 | 192 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 1 | 0.20% | 11 | 172 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.