NAROTTAMBRAHM I.C. SUNDERPUR (R.N.-1) PS 115
NAFEES AHMAD
SPSP179 votes at this polling station
over RAMESH CHAND YADAV (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 179 | 39.08% | |
| 2 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 173 | 37.77% | |
| 3 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 87 | 19.00% | |
| 4 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 4 | 0.87% | |
| 5 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 4 | 0.87% | |
| 6 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 3 | 0.66% | |
| 7 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 8 | SUBASH | NP | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 9 | NOTA | NOTA | 2 | 0.44% | |
| 10 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 11 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 1 | 0.22% | |
| 12 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 458 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 179 | 39.08% | 1 | 228 | Average |
| BSP | 173 | 37.77% | 2 | 91 | Average |
| BJP | 87 | 19.00% | 3 | 265 | Weak |
| VIP | 4 | 0.87% | 5 | 95 | Poor |
| RJM | 4 | 0.87% | 4 | 39 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 3 | 0.66% | 6 | 200 | Poor |
| INC | 2 | 0.44% | 7 | 261 | Poor |
| NOTA | 2 | 0.44% | 8 | 250 | Poor |
| NP | 2 | 0.44% | 9 | 158 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.22% | 10 | 203 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.22% | 11 | 119 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 291 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.