P.V. ARAJI SHANKARPUR (R.N.-3) PS 10
SATYENDRA RAI
BJPBJP179 votes at this polling station
over RAMESH CHAND YADAV (BSP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SATYENDRA RAI | BJP | 179 | 46.86% | |
| 2 | RAMESH CHAND YADAV | BSP | 117 | 30.63% | |
| 3 | NAFEES AHMAD | SP | 60 | 15.71% | |
| 4 | YOGENDRA YADAV | VIP | 11 | 2.88% | |
| 5 | NOTA | NOTA | 6 | 1.57% | |
| 6 | SUBASH | NP | 2 | 0.52% | |
| 7 | MITRASEN | IDPDNT | 2 | 0.52% | |
| 8 | MANOJ KUMAR | BMP | 2 | 0.52% | |
| 9 | ER. SUNIL KUMAR YADAV | AAP | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 10 | MIRZA SHAN ALAM BEG | INC | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 11 | ABDULA | AIMIM | 1 | 0.26% | |
| 12 | MUNNA LAL | RJM | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 382 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 179 | 46.86% | 1 | 149 | Strong |
| BSP | 117 | 30.63% | 2 | 160 | Average |
| SP | 60 | 15.71% | 3 | 385 | Weak |
| VIP | 11 | 2.88% | 4 | 43 | Poor |
| NOTA | 6 | 1.57% | 5 | 58 | Poor |
| NP | 2 | 0.52% | 8 | 137 | Poor |
| IDPDNT | 2 | 0.52% | 7 | 69 | Poor |
| BMP | 2 | 0.52% | 6 | 34 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.26% | 9 | 182 | Poor |
| AIMIM | 1 | 0.26% | 10 | 291 | Poor |
| INC | 1 | 0.26% | 11 | 320 | Poor |
| RJM | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 281 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 344, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.