87-P.V. GANGACHAK PS 87
MURLI MANOHAR JAISWAL
COL 1515529 votes at this polling station
over DEEPAK KUMAR MISHRA "SHAKA" (COL 12)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MURLI MANOHAR JAISWAL | COL 15 | 529 | 82.40% | |
| 2 | DEEPAK KUMAR MISHRA "SHAKA" | COL 12 | 65 | 10.12% | |
| 3 | RAMJEE GIRI | COL 18 | 12 | 1.87% | |
| 4 | BIJAY SHANKER | IND | 11 | 1.71% | |
| 5 | NOTA | COL 48 | 9 | 1.40% | |
| 6 | VINAY LALSAHAB TIWARI | COL 21 | 9 | 1.40% | |
| 7 | RAMIKBAL | COL 30 | 4 | 0.62% | |
| 8 | SUDHIR KUMAR VISHWAKARMA | COL 36 | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 9 | BHASKAR MISHRA | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 10 | ISHWAR CHANDRA VISHWAKARMA | COL 24 | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | MAHANTH | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | KRISHNA CHANDRA DIKSHIT ADVOACATE | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | RAMASHRAY | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 642 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 15 | 529 | 82.40% | 1 | 1 | Strong |
| COL 12 | 65 | 10.12% | 2 | 345 | Weak |
| COL 18 | 12 | 1.87% | 3 | 26 | Poor |
| IND | 12 | 1.87% | 4 | 9 | Poor |
| COL 48 | 9 | 1.40% | 6 | 43 | Poor |
| COL 21 | 9 | 1.40% | 5 | 273 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 4 | 0.62% | 7 | 4 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 117 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 1 | 0.16% | 8 | 138 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 189 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 275 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 342, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.