86-P.V.NAYPUR PS 86
DEEPAK KUMAR MISHRA "SHAKA"
COL 1212331 votes at this polling station
over MURLI MANOHAR JAISWAL (COL 15)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DEEPAK KUMAR MISHRA "SHAKA" | COL 12 | 331 | 54.17% | |
| 2 | MURLI MANOHAR JAISWAL | COL 15 | 164 | 26.84% | |
| 3 | VINAY LALSAHAB TIWARI | COL 21 | 80 | 13.09% | |
| 4 | RAMJEE GIRI | COL 18 | 18 | 2.95% | |
| 5 | NOTA | COL 48 | 7 | 1.15% | |
| 6 | MAHANTH | COL 27 | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 7 | SUDHIR KUMAR VISHWAKARMA | COL 36 | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 8 | KRISHNA CHANDRA DIKSHIT ADVOACATE | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 9 | BHASKAR MISHRA | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 10 | ISHWAR CHANDRA VISHWAKARMA | COL 24 | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | RAMIKBAL | COL 30 | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | RAMASHRAY | COL 33 | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 13 | BIJAY SHANKER | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 611 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 12 | 331 | 54.17% | 1 | 59 | Strong |
| COL 15 | 164 | 26.84% | 2 | 192 | Average |
| COL 21 | 80 | 13.09% | 3 | 106 | Weak |
| COL 18 | 18 | 2.95% | 4 | 9 | Poor |
| COL 48 | 7 | 1.15% | 5 | 85 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 3 | 0.49% | 6 | 8 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 3 | 0.49% | 7 | 21 | Poor |
| IND | 2 | 0.33% | 8 | 263 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 1 | 0.16% | 10 | 67 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 1 | 0.16% | 11 | 145 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 137 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 342, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.