54-P.V. TEKUA PS 54
MURLI MANOHAR JAISWAL
COL 1515166 votes at this polling station
over DEEPAK KUMAR MISHRA "SHAKA" (COL 12)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MURLI MANOHAR JAISWAL | COL 15 | 166 | 50.92% | |
| 2 | DEEPAK KUMAR MISHRA "SHAKA" | COL 12 | 131 | 40.18% | |
| 3 | BIJAY SHANKER | IND | 13 | 3.99% | |
| 4 | RAMJEE GIRI | COL 18 | 6 | 1.84% | |
| 5 | VINAY LALSAHAB TIWARI | COL 21 | 6 | 1.84% | |
| 6 | NOTA | COL 48 | 2 | 0.61% | |
| 7 | BHASKAR MISHRA | IND | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 8 | ISHWAR CHANDRA VISHWAKARMA | COL 24 | 1 | 0.31% | |
| 9 | MAHANTH | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | RAMIKBAL | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | RAMASHRAY | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | SUDHIR KUMAR VISHWAKARMA | COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | KRISHNA CHANDRA DIKSHIT ADVOACATE | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 326 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 15 | 166 | 50.92% | 1 | 186 | Strong |
| COL 12 | 131 | 40.18% | 2 | 298 | Strong |
| IND | 14 | 4.29% | 3 | 5 | Poor |
| COL 18 | 6 | 1.84% | 4 | 108 | Poor |
| COL 21 | 6 | 1.84% | 5 | 295 | Poor |
| COL 48 | 2 | 0.61% | 6 | 271 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 1 | 0.31% | 7 | 123 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 170 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 163 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 266 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 224 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 342, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.