301-P.V.DHURIHATH PS 301
MURLI MANOHAR JAISWAL
COL 1515338 votes at this polling station
over VINAY LALSAHAB TIWARI (COL 21)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MURLI MANOHAR JAISWAL | COL 15 | 338 | 61.45% | |
| 2 | VINAY LALSAHAB TIWARI | COL 21 | 100 | 18.18% | |
| 3 | DEEPAK KUMAR MISHRA "SHAKA" | COL 12 | 90 | 16.36% | |
| 4 | NOTA | COL 48 | 8 | 1.45% | |
| 5 | BIJAY SHANKER | IND | 5 | 0.91% | |
| 6 | RAMJEE GIRI | COL 18 | 5 | 0.91% | |
| 7 | ISHWAR CHANDRA VISHWAKARMA | COL 24 | 2 | 0.36% | |
| 8 | RAMASHRAY | COL 33 | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 9 | SUDHIR KUMAR VISHWAKARMA | COL 36 | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 10 | KRISHNA CHANDRA DIKSHIT ADVOACATE | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | BHASKAR MISHRA | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | MAHANTH | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | RAMIKBAL | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 550 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 15 | 338 | 61.45% | 1 | 30 | Strong |
| COL 21 | 100 | 18.18% | 2 | 83 | Weak |
| COL 12 | 90 | 16.36% | 3 | 331 | Weak |
| COL 48 | 8 | 1.45% | 4 | 71 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 0.91% | 6 | 128 | Poor |
| COL 18 | 5 | 0.91% | 5 | 169 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 2 | 0.36% | 7 | 95 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 1 | 0.18% | 8 | 221 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 1 | 0.18% | 9 | 183 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 315 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 316 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 342, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.