1-P.V. PADARI PS 1
MURLI MANOHAR JAISWAL
SPSAMAJWADI PARTY270 votes at this polling station
over DEEPAK KUMAR MISHRA "SHAKA" (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | MURLI MANOHAR JAISWAL | SP | 270 | 50.66% | |
| 2 | DEEPAK KUMAR MISHRA "SHAKA" | BJP | 178 | 33.40% | |
| 3 | VINAY LALSAHAB TIWARI | BSP | 58 | 10.88% | |
| 4 | RAMJEE GIRI | INC | 13 | 2.44% | |
| 5 | BIJAY SHANKER | IND | 4 | 0.75% | |
| 6 | NOTA | PA | 4 | 0.75% | |
| 7 | RAMASHRAY | MP | 3 | 0.56% | |
| 8 | SUDHIR KUMAR VISHWAKARMA | RTRP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 9 | BHASKAR MISHRA | IND | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 10 | ISHWAR CHANDRA VISHWAKARMA | BMP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 11 | MAHANTH | AJPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | RAMIKBAL | SBSPS | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | KRISHNA CHANDRA DIKSHIT ADVOACATE | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 533 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 270 | 50.66% | 1 | 5 | Strong |
| BJP | 178 | 33.40% | 2 | 7 | Average |
| BSP | 58 | 10.88% | 3 | 7 | Weak |
| INC | 13 | 2.44% | 4 | 2 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 0.94% | 5 | 98 | Poor |
| PA | 4 | 0.75% | 6 | 6 | Poor |
| MP | 3 | 0.56% | 7 | 1 | Poor |
| RTRP | 1 | 0.19% | 9 | 5 | Poor |
| BMP | 1 | 0.19% | 8 | 6 | Poor |
| AJPI | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 7 | Poor |
| SBSPS | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 5 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 342, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.