U.P.S. PAYASI .R.N. 2 PS 414
SURENDRA CHAURASIA
COL 2424225 votes at this polling station
over PUSHPA SHAHI (COL 15)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SURENDRA CHAURASIA | COL 24 | 225 | 50.34% | |
| 2 | PUSHPA SHAHI | COL 15 | 173 | 38.70% | |
| 3 | FASIHA MANZAR GHAZALA LARI | COL 18 | 24 | 5.37% | |
| 4 | SURESH | COL 42 | 7 | 1.57% | |
| 5 | INDRAMOHAN | COL 27 | 4 | 0.89% | |
| 6 | KAUSHAL KISHORE MANI ALIAS | COL 30 | 3 | 0.67% | |
| 7 | DEENANATH KUSHWAHA | COL 33 | 3 | 0.67% | |
| 8 | FIROJ | COL 36 | 3 | 0.67% | |
| 9 | ANAND PRAKASH CHAURASIA | COL 12 | 2 | 0.45% | |
| 10 | SHAHLA AHRARI | COL 21 | 2 | 0.45% | |
| 11 | SURENDR | COL 39 | 1 | 0.22% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 447 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 24 | 225 | 49.45% | 1 | 186 | Strong |
| COL 15 | 173 | 38.02% | 2 | 37 | Average |
| COL 18 | 24 | 5.27% | 3 | 409 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 7 | 1.54% | 4 | 12 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 4 | 0.88% | 5 | 126 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 3 | 0.66% | 6 | 48 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 3 | 0.66% | 7 | 105 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 3 | 0.66% | 8 | 49 | Poor |
| COL 12 | 2 | 0.44% | 9 | 326 | Poor |
| COL 21 | 2 | 0.44% | 10 | 349 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 1 | 0.22% | 11 | 300 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 339, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.