P.V. BAHORVA PS 342
SURENDRA CHAURASIA
COL 2424228 votes at this polling station
over FASIHA MANZAR GHAZALA LARI (COL 18)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SURENDRA CHAURASIA | COL 24 | 228 | 66.09% | |
| 2 | FASIHA MANZAR GHAZALA LARI | COL 18 | 65 | 18.84% | |
| 3 | PUSHPA SHAHI | COL 15 | 48 | 13.91% | |
| 4 | ANAND PRAKASH CHAURASIA | COL 12 | 2 | 0.58% | |
| 5 | INDRAMOHAN | COL 27 | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 6 | FIROJ | COL 36 | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 7 | SURENDR | COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | SURESH | COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | KAUSHAL KISHORE MANI ALIAS | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | DEENANATH KUSHWAHA | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | SHAHLA AHRARI | COL 21 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 345 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 24 | 228 | 65.14% | 1 | 177 | Strong |
| COL 18 | 65 | 18.57% | 2 | 385 | Weak |
| COL 15 | 48 | 13.71% | 3 | 215 | Weak |
| COL 12 | 2 | 0.57% | 4 | 316 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 1 | 0.29% | 5 | 335 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 1 | 0.29% | 6 | 234 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 399 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 394 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 379 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 391 | Poor |
| COL 21 | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 413 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 339, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.