P.V. GOVINDPUR PS 29
FASIHA MANZAR GHAZALA LARI
COL 1818286 votes at this polling station
over SURENDRA CHAURASIA (COL 24)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FASIHA MANZAR GHAZALA LARI | COL 18 | 286 | 46.66% | |
| 2 | SURENDRA CHAURASIA | COL 24 | 225 | 36.70% | |
| 3 | PUSHPA SHAHI | COL 15 | 69 | 11.26% | |
| 4 | ANAND PRAKASH CHAURASIA | COL 12 | 16 | 2.61% | |
| 5 | SHAHLA AHRARI | COL 21 | 10 | 1.63% | |
| 6 | FIROJ | COL 36 | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 7 | DEENANATH KUSHWAHA | COL 33 | 3 | 0.49% | |
| 8 | SURESH | COL 42 | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 9 | SURENDR | COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | INDRAMOHAN | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | KAUSHAL KISHORE MANI ALIAS | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 613 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 18 | 286 | 46.35% | 1 | 63 | Strong |
| COL 24 | 225 | 36.47% | 2 | 183 | Average |
| COL 15 | 69 | 11.18% | 3 | 168 | Weak |
| COL 12 | 16 | 2.59% | 4 | 1 | Poor |
| COL 21 | 10 | 1.62% | 5 | 39 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 3 | 0.49% | 6 | 70 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 3 | 0.49% | 7 | 21 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 1 | 0.16% | 8 | 194 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 309 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 362 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 243 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 339, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.