U.P.S. JAITPURA .R.N.1 PS 265
FASIHA MANZAR GHAZALA LARI
COL 1818349 votes at this polling station
over PUSHPA SHAHI (COL 15)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FASIHA MANZAR GHAZALA LARI | COL 18 | 349 | 93.57% | |
| 2 | PUSHPA SHAHI | COL 15 | 11 | 2.95% | |
| 3 | SURENDRA CHAURASIA | COL 24 | 8 | 2.14% | |
| 4 | DEENANATH KUSHWAHA | COL 33 | 3 | 0.80% | |
| 5 | FIROJ | COL 36 | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 6 | SHAHLA AHRARI | COL 21 | 1 | 0.27% | |
| 7 | SURENDR | COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | SURESH | COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | ANAND PRAKASH CHAURASIA | COL 12 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | INDRAMOHAN | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | KAUSHAL KISHORE MANI ALIAS | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 373 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 18 | 349 | 92.33% | 1 | 25 | Strong |
| COL 15 | 11 | 2.91% | 2 | 353 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 8 | 2.12% | 3 | 414 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 3 | 0.79% | 4 | 93 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 1 | 0.26% | 6 | 211 | Poor |
| COL 21 | 1 | 0.26% | 5 | 382 | Poor |
| COL 12 | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 403 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 378 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 366 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 386 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 347 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 339, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.