P.V. RAGHOPUR PS 17
FASIHA MANZAR GHAZALA LARI
COL 1818191 votes at this polling station
over SURENDRA CHAURASIA (COL 24)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FASIHA MANZAR GHAZALA LARI | COL 18 | 191 | 73.75% | |
| 2 | SURENDRA CHAURASIA | COL 24 | 59 | 22.78% | |
| 3 | PUSHPA SHAHI | COL 15 | 6 | 2.32% | |
| 4 | SHAHLA AHRARI | COL 21 | 3 | 1.16% | |
| 5 | INDRAMOHAN | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 6 | KAUSHAL KISHORE MANI ALIAS | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 7 | DEENANATH KUSHWAHA | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 8 | FIROJ | COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | SURENDR | COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | SURESH | COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | ANAND PRAKASH CHAURASIA | COL 12 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 259 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 18 | 191 | 73.75% | 1 | 164 | Strong |
| COL 24 | 59 | 22.78% | 2 | 397 | Weak |
| COL 15 | 6 | 2.32% | 3 | 385 | Poor |
| COL 21 | 3 | 1.16% | 4 | 233 | Poor |
| COL 12 | 0 | 0.00% | 5 | 387 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 6 | 360 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 7 | 239 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 307 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 261 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 304 | Poor |
| COL 42 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 310 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 339, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.