PRIMARY SCHOOL BHATGAWA ROOM NO.-1 PS 29

AC 335 · 2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polled most here

VINAY PRAKASH GOND

BJPBharatiya Janata Party

327 votes at this polling station

Lead over second

293 70.4 pp

votes

over PURNMASI DEHATI (SBSP)

The electorate

2022 booth list · roll and turnout

Total electors656

Total turnout418votes cast at this station

Turnout %63.7% of this booth's roll

Male electors195

Female electors223

Vote share in this booth

of 416 votes counted

BJP 78.6% SBSP 8.2% BSP 8.2% NCP 3.4% IND 0.5% IND 0.5% IND 0.5% LJPRV 0.2%

Candidates at this booth

12 rows · Form 20

#	Candidate	Party	Votes	Share
1	VINAY PRAKASH GOND	BJP	327	78.61%
2	PURNMASI DEHATI	SBSP	34	8.17%
3	VIJAY KUMAR	BSP	34	8.17%
4	SHAMBHU CHAUDHRY	NCP	14	3.37%
5	GAUTAM	IND	2	0.48%
6	CHANDRABHAN	IND	2	0.48%
7	PINTOO	IND	2	0.48%
8	NAGINA PASWAN ADVOCATE	LJPRV	1	0.24%
9	PRATIMA DEVI	SKP	0	0.00%
10	RAJESH PARASD	JAP	0	0.00%
11	VIMLA DEVI	BMP	0	0.00%
12	SHAMBHU KUMAR (ADVOCATE)	AAP	0	0.00%

Share is each candidate's votes over the 416 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.

Party status in this booth

10 parties · AC 335

Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.

Party	Votes	% of booth	Rank here	Booth rank for party	Status
BJP	327	78.23%	1	173	Strong
BSP	34	8.13%	2	209	Poor
SBSP	34	8.13%	3	373	Poor
NCP	14	3.35%	4	72	Poor
IND	6	1.44%	5	170	Poor
LJPRV	1	0.24%	6	308	Poor
SKP	0	0.00%	10	364	Poor
JAP	0	0.00%	9	290	Poor
AAP	0	0.00%	7	320	Poor
BMP	0	0.00%	8	229	Poor

"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 335, as ranked by the source.

Where this comes from

2022 Vidhan Sabha

Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.