SAMUDAYIK BHAWAN OFFICE COMPOUND N.P. KAPTANGANJ ROOM N0-1 PS 144
PURNMASI DEHATI
SBSPSuheldev Bharatiya Samaj Party243 votes at this polling station
over VINAY PRAKASH GOND (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PURNMASI DEHATI | SBSP | 243 | 49.29% | |
| 2 | VINAY PRAKASH GOND | BJP | 156 | 31.64% | |
| 3 | VIJAY KUMAR | BSP | 69 | 14.00% | |
| 4 | SHAMBHU CHAUDHRY | NCP | 16 | 3.25% | |
| 5 | PRATIMA DEVI | SKP | 4 | 0.81% | |
| 6 | NAGINA PASWAN ADVOCATE | LJPRV | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 7 | SHAMBHU KUMAR (ADVOCATE) | AAP | 2 | 0.41% | |
| 8 | CHANDRABHAN | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 9 | PINTOO | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | RAJESH PARASD | JAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | VIMLA DEVI | BMP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 12 | GAUTAM | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 493 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SBSP | 243 | 48.99% | 1 | 40 | Strong |
| BJP | 156 | 31.45% | 2 | 366 | Average |
| BSP | 69 | 13.91% | 3 | 125 | Weak |
| NCP | 16 | 3.23% | 4 | 54 | Poor |
| SKP | 4 | 0.81% | 5 | 95 | Poor |
| LJPRV | 2 | 0.40% | 7 | 268 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.40% | 6 | 125 | Poor |
| IND | 1 | 0.20% | 8 | 378 | Poor |
| JAP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 340 | Poor |
| BMP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 290 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 335, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.