PRIMARY SCHOOL AKBARPUR ROOM N-1 PS 92
VIKRAMA YADAV
SPSAMAJWADI PARTY355 votes at this polling station
over JAVED KHAN (AIMEI)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VIKRAMA YADAV | SP | 355 | 57.82% | |
| 2 | JAVED KHAN | AIMEI | 214 | 34.85% | |
| 3 | MANISH KUMAR URF MANTU | BJP | 12 | 1.95% | |
| 4 | MD JAHIRUDDIN | INC | 11 | 1.79% | |
| 5 | ASHOK KUMAR TIWARI | SBSPS | 5 | 0.81% | |
| 6 | IJHAR | PP | 5 | 0.81% | |
| 7 | RAVISHANKAR | AAP | 4 | 0.65% | |
| 8 | FAKHARE ALAM ANSARI | SDPI | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 9 | MOSAHAB | IND | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 10 | RAJU | IND | 2 | 0.33% | |
| 11 | PAWAN KUMAR UPADHYAY | BSP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | ANSHUMAN BANKA | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 13 | RAMESH PRASAD | AJP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | DR. ABHISHEK TRIPATHI | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | AINOODDIN AHMAD WARSI | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 614 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 355 | 57.54% | 1 | 25 | Strong |
| AIMEI | 214 | 34.68% | 2 | 3 | Average |
| BJP | 12 | 1.94% | 3 | 413 | Poor |
| INC | 11 | 1.78% | 4 | 78 | Poor |
| PP | 5 | 0.81% | 6 | 17 | Poor |
| IND | 5 | 0.81% | 5 | 370 | Poor |
| SBSPS | 5 | 0.81% | 7 | 17 | Poor |
| AAP | 4 | 0.65% | 8 | 8 | Poor |
| SDPI | 2 | 0.32% | 9 | 97 | Poor |
| BSP | 1 | 0.16% | 10 | 405 | Poor |
| AJP | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 274 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 330, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.