PRIMARY SCHOOL SOHRAUNA ROOM NU-1 PS 209
VIKRAMA YADAV
SPSAMAJWADI PARTY474 votes at this polling station
over JAVED KHAN (AIMEI)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | VIKRAMA YADAV | SP | 474 | 73.72% | |
| 2 | JAVED KHAN | AIMEI | 83 | 12.91% | |
| 3 | MANISH KUMAR URF MANTU | BJP | 61 | 9.49% | |
| 4 | MD JAHIRUDDIN | INC | 8 | 1.24% | |
| 5 | ASHOK KUMAR TIWARI | SBSPS | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 6 | DR. ABHISHEK TRIPATHI | IND | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 7 | ANSHUMAN BANKA | IND | 3 | 0.47% | |
| 8 | PAWAN KUMAR UPADHYAY | BSP | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 9 | AINOODDIN AHMAD WARSI | IND | 2 | 0.31% | |
| 10 | RAMESH PRASAD | AJP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 11 | RAVISHANKAR | AAP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 12 | MOSAHAB | IND | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 13 | IJHAR | PP | 1 | 0.16% | |
| 14 | RAJU | IND | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 15 | FAKHARE ALAM ANSARI | SDPI | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 643 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 474 | 73.60% | 1 | 7 | Strong |
| AIMEI | 83 | 12.89% | 2 | 20 | Weak |
| BJP | 61 | 9.47% | 3 | 396 | Poor |
| IND | 9 | 1.40% | 4 | 296 | Poor |
| INC | 8 | 1.24% | 5 | 169 | Poor |
| SBSPS | 3 | 0.47% | 6 | 85 | Poor |
| BSP | 2 | 0.31% | 7 | 391 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.16% | 8 | 154 | Poor |
| AJP | 1 | 0.16% | 9 | 187 | Poor |
| PP | 1 | 0.16% | 10 | 171 | Poor |
| SDPI | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 330 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 330, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.