R.R. I. C.URUWA PASHCHIM PS 45
Candidate Name 2- Rajesh Tripathi
BJPBJP286 votes at this polling station
over Candidate Name 3- Vinay Shankar Tiwari (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Candidate Name 2- Rajesh Tripathi | BJP | 286 | 49.23% | |
| 2 | Candidate Name 3- Vinay Shankar Tiwari | SP | 240 | 41.31% | |
| 3 | Candidate Name 1- Rajendra Singh Urf Pahalwan Singh | BSP | 45 | 7.75% | |
| 4 | Candidate Name 4- Soniya Shukla | NCP | 3 | 0.52% | |
| 5 | Candidate Name 6- Poonam Gupta | ASPKR | 3 | 0.52% | |
| 6 | Candidate Name 7- Ravindra | JAP | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 7 | Candidate Name 8- Subhash Chandra Dubey Gorakhpuri | RJBVP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 8 | Candidate Name 9- Suraj Kumar | AAP | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 9 | Candidate Name 5- Chintamani Pandey | BASP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 581 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 286 | 49.06% | 1 | 73 | Strong |
| SP | 240 | 41.17% | 2 | 62 | Strong |
| BSP | 45 | 7.72% | 3 | 320 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 3 | 0.51% | 4 | 284 | Poor |
| NCP | 3 | 0.51% | 5 | 150 | Poor |
| JAP | 2 | 0.34% | 6 | 136 | Poor |
| RJBVP | 1 | 0.17% | 8 | 222 | Poor |
| AAP | 1 | 0.17% | 7 | 221 | Poor |
| BASP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 292 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 328, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.