P. M. V. CHAINPUR PASHCHIM PS 381
Candidate Name 3- Vinay Shankar Tiwari
SPSP420 votes at this polling station
over Candidate Name 2- Rajesh Tripathi (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Candidate Name 3- Vinay Shankar Tiwari | SP | 420 | 72.16% | |
| 2 | Candidate Name 2- Rajesh Tripathi | BJP | 149 | 25.60% | |
| 3 | Candidate Name 7- Ravindra | JAP | 3 | 0.52% | |
| 4 | Candidate Name 8- Subhash Chandra Dubey Gorakhpuri | RJBVP | 3 | 0.52% | |
| 5 | Candidate Name 4- Soniya Shukla | NCP | 3 | 0.52% | |
| 6 | Candidate Name 5- Chintamani Pandey | BASP | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 7 | Candidate Name 1- Rajendra Singh Urf Pahalwan Singh | BSP | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 8 | Candidate Name 9- Suraj Kumar | AAP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Candidate Name 6- Poonam Gupta | ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 582 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 420 | 72.04% | 1 | 6 | Strong |
| BJP | 149 | 25.56% | 2 | 326 | Average |
| JAP | 3 | 0.51% | 3 | 117 | Poor |
| NCP | 3 | 0.51% | 4 | 204 | Poor |
| RJBVP | 3 | 0.51% | 5 | 91 | Poor |
| BASP | 2 | 0.34% | 6 | 90 | Poor |
| BSP | 2 | 0.34% | 7 | 502 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 475 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 507 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 328, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.