PANCHAYAT BHAWAN DEVKALI PURAV PS 183
Candidate Name 2- Rajesh Tripathi
BJPBJP349 votes at this polling station
over Candidate Name 3- Vinay Shankar Tiwari (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Candidate Name 2- Rajesh Tripathi | BJP | 349 | 74.57% | |
| 2 | Candidate Name 3- Vinay Shankar Tiwari | SP | 64 | 13.68% | |
| 3 | Candidate Name 7- Ravindra | JAP | 32 | 6.84% | |
| 4 | Candidate Name 1- Rajendra Singh Urf Pahalwan Singh | BSP | 12 | 2.56% | |
| 5 | Candidate Name 4- Soniya Shukla | NCP | 5 | 1.07% | |
| 6 | Candidate Name 5- Chintamani Pandey | BASP | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 7 | Candidate Name 9- Suraj Kumar | AAP | 2 | 0.43% | |
| 8 | Candidate Name 6- Poonam Gupta | ASPKR | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 9 | Candidate Name 8- Subhash Chandra Dubey Gorakhpuri | RJBVP | 1 | 0.21% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 468 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 349 | 74.57% | 1 | 29 | Strong |
| SP | 64 | 13.68% | 2 | 440 | Weak |
| JAP | 32 | 6.84% | 3 | 9 | Poor |
| BSP | 12 | 2.56% | 4 | 430 | Poor |
| NCP | 5 | 1.07% | 5 | 59 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.43% | 6 | 137 | Poor |
| BASP | 2 | 0.43% | 7 | 65 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 1 | 0.21% | 8 | 415 | Poor |
| RJBVP | 1 | 0.21% | 9 | 265 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 328, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.