PRIMARY SCHOOL BANWARPAR PS 129
Candidate Name 2- Rajesh Tripathi
BJPBJP282 votes at this polling station
over Candidate Name 3- Vinay Shankar Tiwari (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Candidate Name 2- Rajesh Tripathi | BJP | 282 | 53.51% | |
| 2 | Candidate Name 3- Vinay Shankar Tiwari | SP | 210 | 39.85% | |
| 3 | Candidate Name 1- Rajendra Singh Urf Pahalwan Singh | BSP | 16 | 3.04% | |
| 4 | Candidate Name 7- Ravindra | JAP | 9 | 1.71% | |
| 5 | Candidate Name 9- Suraj Kumar | AAP | 6 | 1.14% | |
| 6 | Candidate Name 4- Soniya Shukla | NCP | 3 | 0.57% | |
| 7 | Candidate Name 8- Subhash Chandra Dubey Gorakhpuri | RJBVP | 1 | 0.19% | |
| 8 | Candidate Name 5- Chintamani Pandey | BASP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 9 | Candidate Name 6- Poonam Gupta | ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 527 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 282 | 53.51% | 1 | 78 | Strong |
| SP | 210 | 39.85% | 2 | 95 | Average |
| BSP | 16 | 3.04% | 3 | 408 | Poor |
| JAP | 9 | 1.71% | 4 | 38 | Poor |
| AAP | 6 | 1.14% | 5 | 5 | Poor |
| NCP | 3 | 0.57% | 6 | 168 | Poor |
| RJBVP | 1 | 0.19% | 7 | 245 | Poor |
| ASPKR | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 481 | Poor |
| BASP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 332 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 328, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.