JANTA INTER CO. SHAHPUR R.N 4 PS 455
Vidyasagar 3
COL 1818159 votes at this polling station
over Shriram Chauhan 4 (COL 21)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vidyasagar 3 | COL 18 | 159 | 45.95% | |
| 2 | Shriram Chauhan 4 | COL 21 | 116 | 33.53% | |
| 3 | Rupawati Beldar 2 | COL 15 | 46 | 13.29% | |
| 4 | Nota | COL 42 | 14 | 4.05% | |
| 5 | Rajani 1 | COL 12 | 6 | 1.73% | |
| 6 | Rajkumar 9 | COL 36 | 3 | 0.87% | |
| 7 | Rishikapoor 10 | COL 39 | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 8 | Amita Bharti 5 | COL 24 | 1 | 0.29% | |
| 9 | Gauri Shankar 6 | COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 10 | Deenbandhu 7 | COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 11 | Ramesh chandra 8 | COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 346 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COL 18 | 159 | 47.46% | 1 | 79 | Strong |
| COL 21 | 116 | 34.63% | 2 | 377 | Average |
| COL 15 | 46 | 13.73% | 3 | 378 | Weak |
| COL 42 | 14 | 4.18% | 4 | 3 | Poor |
| COL 12 | 6 | 1.79% | 5 | 146 | Poor |
| COL 36 | 3 | 0.90% | 6 | 132 | Poor |
| COL 39 | 1 | 0.30% | 8 | 319 | Poor |
| COL 24 | 1 | 0.30% | 7 | 389 | Poor |
| COL 27 | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 456 | Poor |
| COL 30 | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 457 | Poor |
| COL 33 | 0 | 0.00% | 11 | 457 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 325, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.