P.V. KHANPUR ROOM NO.2 PS 446
GYANENDRA SINGH
BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY219 votes at this polling station
over KRISHNABHAN (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GYANENDRA SINGH | BJP | 219 | 43.89% | |
| 2 | KRISHNABHAN | SP | 149 | 29.86% | |
| 3 | OMPRAKASH CHAURASIA | BSP | 73 | 14.63% | |
| 4 | SHATRUDHAN SINGH NISHAD | ASP | 23 | 4.61% | |
| 5 | SHAMSHAD AALAM | AIMEI | 12 | 2.40% | |
| 6 | SHARDENDU KUMAR PANDEY | INC | 7 | 1.40% | |
| 7 | PRAFULL | IND | 5 | 1.00% | |
| 8 | AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI | IND | 3 | 0.60% | |
| 9 | AWDHESH SINGH SAITHWAR | AAP | 3 | 0.60% | |
| 10 | RAMCHANDRA | AJPI | 2 | 0.40% | |
| 11 | PRAVEEN | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 12 | HARINARAYAN | IND | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 13 | SURESH CHAND | BASP | 1 | 0.20% | |
| 14 | CHHEDI MAJDOOR | IND | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 499 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 219 | 43.89% | 1 | 329 | Strong |
| SP | 149 | 29.86% | 2 | 206 | Average |
| BSP | 73 | 14.63% | 3 | 203 | Weak |
| ASP | 23 | 4.61% | 4 | 2 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 12 | 2.40% | 5 | 73 | Poor |
| IND | 10 | 2.00% | 6 | 174 | Poor |
| INC | 7 | 1.40% | 7 | 169 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.60% | 8 | 238 | Poor |
| AJPI | 2 | 0.40% | 9 | 57 | Poor |
| BASP | 1 | 0.20% | 10 | 188 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 319, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.