P.V. AHIRAULI ROOM NO.1 PS 420
GYANENDRA SINGH
BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY198 votes at this polling station
over KRISHNABHAN (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GYANENDRA SINGH | BJP | 198 | 42.04% | |
| 2 | KRISHNABHAN | SP | 166 | 35.24% | |
| 3 | OMPRAKASH CHAURASIA | BSP | 73 | 15.50% | |
| 4 | SHARDENDU KUMAR PANDEY | INC | 9 | 1.91% | |
| 5 | SHATRUDHAN SINGH NISHAD | ASP | 5 | 1.06% | |
| 6 | PRAFULL | IND | 4 | 0.85% | |
| 7 | PRAVEEN | IND | 4 | 0.85% | |
| 8 | HARINARAYAN | IND | 3 | 0.64% | |
| 9 | SHAMSHAD AALAM | AIMEI | 3 | 0.64% | |
| 10 | AWDHESH SINGH SAITHWAR | AAP | 3 | 0.64% | |
| 11 | RAMCHANDRA | AJPI | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 12 | AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 13 | CHHEDI MAJDOOR | IND | 1 | 0.21% | |
| 14 | SURESH CHAND | BASP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 471 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 198 | 42.04% | 1 | 356 | Strong |
| SP | 166 | 35.24% | 2 | 169 | Average |
| BSP | 73 | 15.50% | 3 | 202 | Weak |
| IND | 13 | 2.76% | 4 | 108 | Poor |
| INC | 9 | 1.91% | 5 | 105 | Poor |
| ASP | 5 | 1.06% | 6 | 28 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 3 | 0.64% | 8 | 171 | Poor |
| AAP | 3 | 0.64% | 7 | 234 | Poor |
| AJPI | 1 | 0.21% | 9 | 183 | Poor |
| BASP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 445 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 319, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.