P.V. CHAUPARIYA ROOM NO.1 PS 386
GYANENDRA SINGH
BJPBHARATIYA JANATA PARTY346 votes at this polling station
over KRISHNABHAN (SP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | GYANENDRA SINGH | BJP | 346 | 59.25% | |
| 2 | KRISHNABHAN | SP | 185 | 31.68% | |
| 3 | PRAFULL | IND | 17 | 2.91% | |
| 4 | OMPRAKASH CHAURASIA | BSP | 15 | 2.57% | |
| 5 | SHARDENDU KUMAR PANDEY | INC | 8 | 1.37% | |
| 6 | SHATRUDHAN SINGH NISHAD | ASP | 6 | 1.03% | |
| 7 | CHHEDI MAJDOOR | IND | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 8 | HARINARAYAN | IND | 2 | 0.34% | |
| 9 | AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 10 | PRAVEEN | IND | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 11 | RAMCHANDRA | AJPI | 1 | 0.17% | |
| 12 | SHAMSHAD AALAM | AIMEI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | SURESH CHAND | BASP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | AWDHESH SINGH SAITHWAR | AAP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 584 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJP | 346 | 59.25% | 1 | 143 | Strong |
| SP | 185 | 31.68% | 2 | 137 | Average |
| IND | 23 | 3.94% | 3 | 35 | Poor |
| BSP | 15 | 2.57% | 4 | 383 | Poor |
| INC | 8 | 1.37% | 5 | 131 | Poor |
| ASP | 6 | 1.03% | 6 | 19 | Poor |
| AJPI | 1 | 0.17% | 7 | 170 | Poor |
| AAP | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 462 | Poor |
| AIMEI | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 439 | Poor |
| BASP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 426 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 319, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.