P.M.V.TARKULWA TIWARI PASHCHIMI PS 346
KRISHNABHAN
SPSAMAJWADI PARTY292 votes at this polling station
over GYANENDRA SINGH (BJP)
The electorate
Vote share in this booth
Candidates at this booth
| # | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | KRISHNABHAN | SP | 292 | 53.58% | |
| 2 | GYANENDRA SINGH | BJP | 127 | 23.30% | |
| 3 | OMPRAKASH CHAURASIA | BSP | 84 | 15.41% | |
| 4 | SHAMSHAD AALAM | AIMEI | 15 | 2.75% | |
| 5 | SHARDENDU KUMAR PANDEY | INC | 14 | 2.57% | |
| 6 | PRAVEEN | IND | 3 | 0.55% | |
| 7 | HARINARAYAN | IND | 3 | 0.55% | |
| 8 | AJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI | IND | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 9 | AWDHESH SINGH SAITHWAR | AAP | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 10 | PRAFULL | IND | 2 | 0.37% | |
| 11 | CHHEDI MAJDOOR | IND | 1 | 0.18% | |
| 12 | RAMCHANDRA | AJPI | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 13 | SHATRUDHAN SINGH NISHAD | ASP | 0 | 0.00% | |
| 14 | SURESH CHAND | BASP | 0 | 0.00% |
Share is each candidate's votes over the 545 votes counted at this station, computed here from the candidate rows themselves — the source publishes no booth total of its own on this table.
Party status in this booth
Strong, Average, Weak and Poor are the source's own classification of a party's performance in a booth, carried through unchanged — we neither assign nor recompute them.
| Party | Votes | % of booth | Rank here | Booth rank for party | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SP | 292 | 53.58% | 1 | 42 | Strong |
| BJP | 127 | 23.30% | 2 | 417 | Weak |
| BSP | 84 | 15.41% | 3 | 173 | Weak |
| AIMEI | 15 | 2.75% | 4 | 61 | Poor |
| INC | 14 | 2.57% | 5 | 32 | Poor |
| IND | 11 | 2.02% | 6 | 143 | Poor |
| AAP | 2 | 0.37% | 7 | 305 | Poor |
| AJPI | 0 | 0.00% | 8 | 402 | Poor |
| ASP | 0 | 0.00% | 9 | 418 | Poor |
| BASP | 0 | 0.00% | 10 | 396 | Poor |
"Booth rank for party" is this station's position among every booth that party contested in AC 319, as ranked by the source.
Where this comes from
Polling-station Form 20 sheets for Uttar Pradesh, 2022 Vidhan Sabha. Booth data is Uttar Pradesh only: the source tables key on assembly-constituency number and carry no state column, so nothing here should be read as national coverage.